If MLB The Show 25 introduces full team relocation, it must include financial consequences and market dynamics to MLB The Show 25 Stubs make the experience feel realistic. Moving a franchise isn’t as simple as picking a city and designing a stadium—it involves relocation fees, market viability, fan loyalty, and long-term financial sustainability.
A deep relocation system would add strategy and realism, forcing players to evaluate risks and rewards before moving their team.
1. Relocation Fees & Approval Process
In real MLB, team relocations require approval from team owners and the league, along with financial costs. MLB The Show 25 could introduce:
Relocation Fees: Teams must pay a league-imposed fee, which varies based on market potential and existing team contracts.
League Approval Process: MLB might deny relocation if the move isn’t financially viable or if another team has territorial rights (e.g., trying to move into New York or Los Angeles).
Owner & Fan Backlash: Team owners, local governments, and fans might oppose a move, leading to potential financial penalties or negative fan reactions.
Example: Moving the Oakland Athletics to Las Vegas could cost a $1 billion relocation fee, while moving a small-market team to Portland might have a lower financial barrier.
2. Market Size & Revenue Potential
Different cities offer unique economic opportunities and challenges based on:
Market Size: Large cities (New York, Los Angeles, Chicago) generate more revenue through ticket sales, sponsorships, and TV deals.
Competition: Moving a team to a city with multiple pro sports teams (e.g., Denver, Houston) could reduce attendance if the team struggles.
Baseball Popularity: Some cities have strong baseball traditions (e.g., St. Louis, Boston), while others may need time to develop a loyal fanbase.
Example:
Moving a team to Las Vegas might bring a huge financial boost due to tourism and sponsorships.
Moving a team to Nashville could grow the game but might take years to buy MLB The Show 25 Stubs develop a strong following.
